1 thought on “How to play its greatest role in a team?”
Elizabeth
Common questions in the interview: "What kind of leaders do you want to work with?" The interview question is both a trap and an opportunity. The interviewer should seize the opportunity, try to avoid specific hope for superiors, and talk about their requirements for themselves.
This problem seems very simple, in fact, there is a lot of articles. It is even more appropriate to say that he is a question of investigating emotional intelligence. The aspects of his inspection include self -awareness, values, active spirit, communication and collaboration ability, adaptability, management ability, and so on. Candidates are prone to mistakes to stay on the requirements of superiors, and do not combine themselves when they express expectations. In this way, the interviewer will feel that you are picky, not humble, not practical ...
The space here, I hope you can think about what you should answer before you look at it?
The more interesting answers to let's analyze it together.
I answers, it is quite satisfactory, not humble:
The I hope my superiors can guide me at work, and I can immediately point out the mistakes in my work. I hope I can grow up quickly with the company and the team in the efficient team. Such answers are not humble. Positioning the angle on the guidance of superiors, eager to grow together, and have a good posture.
Is to answer two, reduce the posture, and ask for consultation:
I I hope to work with the leaders who know how to use them, understand the characteristics and potential of their subordinates, and assign them to exercise to exercise him The work allows him to grow and enrich in his work. When the current subordinates encounter confusion, the leaders can give pointers one or two, so that the subordinates can adjust themselves as soon as possible and invest in work in a good state. I will also seize the opportunity to communicate with leaders and ask the leaders; observe the methods of leading organizations to deal with things, compare the loss of myself, and continue to improve. Study slowly from such words and educational teaching, and gradually improve.
I answering three, showing your own communication and adaptability:
The point is not what the other party is, how we communicate with superiors and complete work, because In many cases, what kind of person is a superior is not what we can determine. The reason why superiors become superiors is because they have extraordinary places, no matter what kind of superiors, I will learn their strengths from them. If it is a serious leader, I will learn his serious attitude. If it is a friendly leader, I will learn his ability to live
very standard answers. The only thing that needs to be modified is that what kind of person is a person who is too straightforward to modify, for example, you can say that even if you are a boss with different styles of work, you can actively adjust yourself from the perspective of work. And active.
I answering four, starting from the perspective of the company, it also shows that the characteristics of their own characteristics and posts are high:
The saying that people are divided into groups. The collection of people such as corporate culture, so I hope that the superiors and I have the same relationship with me in terms of characteristics, because the same thing is more likely to resonate, which is conducive to the effective work. Well, we can learn the advantages of the other party from complementarity. Proper complementary may be able to regulate the working atmosphere, which is also a manifestation of multiculturalism.
This is very good in terms of characteristics and personality characteristics. But if you want to tell your characteristics first, the company will understand whether it is consistent with you. It is better to find the characteristics of the company first and make your own characteristics match the company, so that the interviewer feels that you are fighting! Then add your above text to the back
answering five, comprehensive answer:
, as a subordinate, the most basic requirement is to well execute the superior command of the superior command. Therefore, no matter what kind of people are, the tasks of the superiors must be completed. Secondly, since he can become my superior, it means that he has certain management talents and will objectively evaluate my performance and ability. Therefore, I will listen carefully to the opinions of my superiors. As a newcomer in the workplace, all I need to do is exert it. I have learned to make practical contributions to the company. Third, the company's appointment must recognize corporate culture, and this is one of the reasons for my choice of your company, so I believe I will work with my superior. The obedience to the superiors is very positive, and it also expresses the attitude towards work and labor. There are also expansion. It is really a good approach to explain the appointment of superiors and corporate culture. It is better to be able to tell which corporate culture.
But in the end I want to remind that this similar open question does not have a standard answer. You must answer your own personality characteristics and on -the -spot performance. Otherwise, the interviewer will feel that your performance is inconsistent, either prepared in advance, only knowing that its shape is unknown, or lying, not sincere enough. This will affect your final interview results.
Common questions in the interview: "What kind of leaders do you want to work with?"
The interview question is both a trap and an opportunity. The interviewer should seize the opportunity, try to avoid specific hope for superiors, and talk about their requirements for themselves.
This problem seems very simple, in fact, there is a lot of articles. It is even more appropriate to say that he is a question of investigating emotional intelligence. The aspects of his inspection include self -awareness, values, active spirit, communication and collaboration ability, adaptability, management ability, and so on. Candidates are prone to mistakes to stay on the requirements of superiors, and do not combine themselves when they express expectations. In this way, the interviewer will feel that you are picky, not humble, not practical ...
The space here, I hope you can think about what you should answer before you look at it?
The more interesting answers to let's analyze it together.
I answers, it is quite satisfactory, not humble:
The I hope my superiors can guide me at work, and I can immediately point out the mistakes in my work. I hope I can grow up quickly with the company and the team in the efficient team. Such answers are not humble. Positioning the angle on the guidance of superiors, eager to grow together, and have a good posture.
Is to answer two, reduce the posture, and ask for consultation:
I I hope to work with the leaders who know how to use them, understand the characteristics and potential of their subordinates, and assign them to exercise to exercise him The work allows him to grow and enrich in his work. When the current subordinates encounter confusion, the leaders can give pointers one or two, so that the subordinates can adjust themselves as soon as possible and invest in work in a good state. I will also seize the opportunity to communicate with leaders and ask the leaders; observe the methods of leading organizations to deal with things, compare the loss of myself, and continue to improve. Study slowly from such words and educational teaching, and gradually improve.
I answering three, showing your own communication and adaptability:
The point is not what the other party is, how we communicate with superiors and complete work, because In many cases, what kind of person is a superior is not what we can determine. The reason why superiors become superiors is because they have extraordinary places, no matter what kind of superiors, I will learn their strengths from them. If it is a serious leader, I will learn his serious attitude. If it is a friendly leader, I will learn his ability to live
very standard answers. The only thing that needs to be modified is that what kind of person is a person who is too straightforward to modify, for example, you can say that even if you are a boss with different styles of work, you can actively adjust yourself from the perspective of work. And active.
I answering four, starting from the perspective of the company, it also shows that the characteristics of their own characteristics and posts are high:
The saying that people are divided into groups. The collection of people such as corporate culture, so I hope that the superiors and I have the same relationship with me in terms of characteristics, because the same thing is more likely to resonate, which is conducive to the effective work. Well, we can learn the advantages of the other party from complementarity. Proper complementary may be able to regulate the working atmosphere, which is also a manifestation of multiculturalism.
This is very good in terms of characteristics and personality characteristics. But if you want to tell your characteristics first, the company will understand whether it is consistent with you. It is better to find the characteristics of the company first and make your own characteristics match the company, so that the interviewer feels that you are fighting! Then add your above text to the back
answering five, comprehensive answer:
, as a subordinate, the most basic requirement is to well execute the superior command of the superior command. Therefore, no matter what kind of people are, the tasks of the superiors must be completed. Secondly, since he can become my superior, it means that he has certain management talents and will objectively evaluate my performance and ability. Therefore, I will listen carefully to the opinions of my superiors. As a newcomer in the workplace, all I need to do is exert it. I have learned to make practical contributions to the company. Third, the company's appointment must recognize corporate culture, and this is one of the reasons for my choice of your company, so I believe I will work with my superior. The obedience to the superiors is very positive, and it also expresses the attitude towards work and labor. There are also expansion. It is really a good approach to explain the appointment of superiors and corporate culture. It is better to be able to tell which corporate culture.
But in the end I want to remind that this similar open question does not have a standard answer. You must answer your own personality characteristics and on -the -spot performance. Otherwise, the interviewer will feel that your performance is inconsistent, either prepared in advance, only knowing that its shape is unknown, or lying, not sincere enough. This will affect your final interview results.