. Foreword group P may be a nightmare for many students, because they are unfamiliar to the form of interviews, they are not talking about tension. There is even no concept of the topic of the discussion. The younger brother once had such doubts, but when he came in a semester, he successfully passed the group noodles of Bei Electric, Ernstone, Ericsson, Mei'an Jianye, Vanke, Nestlé, GE Medical and other companies. I still have accumulated some experience, and I feel that the skills of the group are relatively more skillful. Personally, I feel that there are too many uncertain factors in one side. Many times, they must be determined by the interviewers' preferences and moods, and the criteria for judging groups are relatively more and relatively quantitative, so there will be more strategies. Now I will write my own experience, hoping to help brothers and sisters who are still troubled in the group and later.
. The classification of group surface 1. The general group P as long as the interviewer or the interviewer is more than 1 From the perspective of the interviewer, there are generally 1 pair, more to 1 and more: 1 pair multiple: The essence of this interview is still single -sided. I will not give ugliness here. The main thing to pay attention to is to take care of the feelings of the interviewers. Try to communicate with all the interviewers when I introduce themselves and answer questions. The official said that at the next paragraph, look at another interviewer to express naturally as much as possible. Of course, when thinking, I always looked at a certain interviewer. Mest pairs 1: This is the most insignificant and most inspector interview method, which generates the root cause is the HR laziness of recruiting companies! Intersection In order to save time, the interviewer hopes to pick out the outstanding performance from the crowd in a short time. The general process is to introduce themselves in turn, and then the interviewer asked questions. Different from the number of interviewers and interviews, the interviewer's questions are different. There are more people and less people. Generally, interviewers ask interviewers who are interested in. On the contrary, if there is no time for people, the same question is raised to allow the interviewer to answer in turn. For the former, the key is self -introduction. In addition to carefully preparing your own self -introduction and learning to avoid strengths and avoid weaknesses, more importantly, prepare a version of different lengths, such as 5 seconds (can be used to answer "one word or one sentence to introduce yourself", "Your biggest feature is your biggest feature is What "," How do people around you evaluate you "and other issues such as one -sided), 30 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes. The purpose is to highlight yourself as much as possible within the specified time (of course, the advantages), and let the interviewer remember himself. After the self -introduction, the back is basically the same. For the latter, the self -introduction mentioned earlier is also applicable, because this is the best time to express itself, but more importantly, the next question answer. For this part, although the nature is similar to one -sided, it is more difficult, and the interviewer should be compared. This requires us to make full preparations before the interview, including resume and openness. For resumes, it is best to use the STAR rule to answer, and strive to make your example plump. Every work and decision you make is strictly thinking. Regarding open issues, we must not only think about their actual situation, but also think about how most people answer and what unique insights can they have. After preparing, it is the time to answer during the interview. Generally speaking, the interviewer does not limit the order of the interviewer, but is tended to be voluntary. You can choose to answer the questions that you have a confidence or have unique insights. As for the question that can only be said and has no distinctive answers, we must take the initiative to answer, seize the opportunity, and say everything I can think of. In the end, it is a good choice to listen to other people's views. Finally, making a consent summary of consent is a compromise. Of course, these are not absolute. Even if you are sure of all the problems, you can also converge appropriately and let others answer first, instead of being too strong. Mreasing: This interviews are the comprehensive version of the above two, but the number of people will not be too much. It should be noted that the above is the above.
2. The narrow group P is mainly similar to one -sided one side. Now the discussion is the real group. Role play, debate and other methods have their own characteristics. The group as mentioned below is a narrow group. The discussion of the non -leadership group is mainly discussed. The different points of other ways of the group will be mentioned separately.
. The form of group surface Whether it is a group of faces, the layout of its originality is similar, more pairs, and one interviewer does the opening white, including the interview process and requirements Wait. After the interview, the interviewer no longer speaks, nor will he participate in the discussion. The entire process is over to the end of the interviewer. The interviewer will be distributed in different corners of the interview venue to observe the performance of each interviewer and record. Of course, there is a limited time for the interview process, and the interviewer will announce the time when it is over. It companies will let the interviewer use white paper to make a card before the interview starts, and write their own names to facilitate the recognition of the interviewer. For the interviewer, everyone will sit together and not side by side because it must be convenient to discuss. And the company usually prepares related information and paper. After the interview officially started, the interviewer spent a short period of time reading and thinking alone. In the end, the task that the group needed to complete was considered their opinions and made appropriate records. Then the interviewers took turns to express their own ideas. Next is a free discussion. Finally, according to the specific requirements, the summary statement is made. Generally, before making the final statement to the interviewer, the content of the group should be summarized and reached a consensus or supplemented (this step is not necessarily there. Nortel's role -playing is just the role -playing of Nortel's role. ). In the interview, the company needs to recover all the information, including draft paper, so it is generally prohibited from taking notes and signs on the information. This should be noted. For draft paper, it is difficult to say if it affects the results of the interview, but there is no harm to develop a good note habit, haha.
. Guidance thought has said so much, and has not said anything skillful. Why is this? In fact, I personally think that the skills are always used for extra points, and the essence and content of discussion are the key, so we should pay attention to and think about the discussion issues. Generally speaking, the problems of group noodles are non -professional. It mainly examines the interviewer's analytical ability, logical thinking ability, innovation ability, solve problems and on -the -spot response (other expression skills, teamwork spirit, etc. Not discuss this part). The so -called guidance thought, in fact, there is nothing else. The philosophy we have been learning from college in high school is enough. Dialectics, two points, grasping the main contradictions, the overall view, the world is constantly changing development, etc. These are the truths that everyone has learned and easy to understand, but in ordinary life and even interviews, it is difficult for us to use these these To help us analyze the problem. In my experience, not all the truths will be completely used. Just catch two: the overall situation, vertical and horizontal analysis 1. The overall situation At the time of speaking, I caught the problem that I was finally solved and simply talked about my own solution.我的做法是，先对材料做一个整体的分析，把几个问题理清：材料基于一个怎样的环境与前提，材料中最大的问题（不一定是需要我们讨论解决的问题，但有可能是What are the root causes of all issues, what are the causes and logical relationships of the problem, and what kind of standards should we set to look at the problem. With logical analysis and standards, I will put forward my own views based on my own analysis and standards. The advantage of this is that you can have a global understanding of the problem without picking up sesame seeds and throwing watermelon. At the same time, you can also express your ability to the interviewer. 2. Vertical and horizontal analysis The basic analysis of the material must be seen in the argument or point of view. During the interview, everyone's point of view is inevitable, but there are still ways to make their views full as much as possible. Stime analysis: This is the easiest. Try to support your views as much as possible. It can be from the same type, or from different types. Of course, the level of younger brothers is limited. Not only the examples of the centers do not necessarily match what I want to say, but even the views I mentioned are more mentally ill, so for reference only, the big cows laughed. Nestlé topic: The debate: the more choices, the more happiness is the more? our point of view: The more you choose, the more happiness the happiness In starting from life, four directions of clothing, food, housing and transportation, find arguments, school uniforms, rice dining dishes, housing units, travel transportation tools, etc. What a better. Diver into the usual entertainment method, such as music before bedtime, diversity of TV shows, etc. Combined with the current job finding work, the more choices from recruitment companies and candidates ... are very useful in the debate competition. Everyone has something to say, having the opportunity to express themselves, and the performance of the entire team will give people one person. At that time, the discussion point mentioned by our opponent did not have obvious logical relationships, so the content of each person's speaking was almost the same, and the repetitiveness was great. Another advantage is that when we debate freely, we can easily dominate the topic, because the scope is wide, we can find examples, and we can launch an attack from multiple points. Themored analysis: This is mainly a matter of consciousness, and it is easy to be ignored. Many times when expressing their views, using this consciousness to supplement the description will give people a sense of strict thinking. Specifically, your own point of view is only suitable for local time, because everything is constantly developing and changing. Vientiane questions: The group discussion: Definition of success? Is it successful in scolding? Background information: Zhang Ziyi, Hu Ge Horizontal analysis: The definition of success can be divided into two aspects to discuss (standard), personal value and social value. Success to different people has different meanings. Even ordinary people, as long as he is satisfied with his work, family and life, then he has succeeded Lallplace analysis: Simply with his lifetime in his life. Combining, instant glory is not equal to eternal. Even if the characters mentioned in the materials are successful, it is temporary, and it cannot directly judge that the success of this person is a lifetime. For case analysis, Case Study is generally used in training rather than recruitment. The case analysis in the interview is actually not much different from the discussion of the non -leadership group, mainly focusing on the focus. Case analysis will pay more attention to the process and reason of the conclusion.
. The division of characters Finally talked about a little technical problem. First of all, many people have heard that there are different roles in the group, including time, including time, including time, including time, including time, including time, including time Control Time, Leader, recorder, summons, etc. Some students like to do this division of labor before the interview and designate the role of each person. I am more opposed to this approach. First of all, these characters never need to tell the interviewer, and the interviewer will have his own judgment. Secondly, except for Time, the determination of other characters is not conducive to the final performance of the group. The first is the leader. There is no need to say this thing at all, otherwise it may cause the argument. The concept of time, but pays more attention to details and pay attention to all the requirements of the discussion. So what does it say that there is no clear leader? Then there is a recorder. In fact, this is the worst. The ideal method is that everyone must take notes, not only their own opinions, but also the views of others. Because if your speech is only from your own perspective, it will be very one -sided. And only when you listen to and record the opinions of others, will you have the opportunity to analyze the views of others, so as to refute or improve your views. Finally, the summary. Generally speaking, the conclusion needs a clearer thinking, which is what I said before the overall situation and logical thinking. Do it, and the same, it is difficult to know which one is most suitable for this summary before the discussion. S summary of the responsibilities of various roles: time: Pay attention to arrange the entire discussion process. How long does it take for each link, almost time to remind all members. Leader: This responsibility is relatively vague (originally discussion of no leadership group). Generally, it is the process of hosting the entire discussion, reminding members not to leave the problem, pay attention to the length of the speech, etc. Of course, there are other qualities, which will be mentioned later. recorder: clearly record the views and speeches of everyone, and organize it to the summary. This requires a clear note ability to minimize the difficulty of reading. Generally, the words should not be too ugly. Each person's point of view is clear. List according to some points, and make appropriate attention. The summary: The result of the discussion of the group stated to the interviewer. The main thing is to pay attention to the logic and rules of speaking. It is best to explain the process of thinking about the group members. Of course, if the amount of some statements is relatively large, the points can be expanded to other members. This to play this way, I played it once. The biggest feeling is to fully integrate into the role, and after watching the materials, communicate with members of other characters as soon as possible. Because usually, the material held by a character does not have the content of other characters, so only through full communication can we understand the situation of the entire discussion and the problem to be actually solved.
6. Tips and precautions The following are some tips summarized by the younger brother. You can still use it appropriately to add points on the group. Of course Again. The primary version:
1. Grab Time This to hold the watch or mobile phone in your hand before the interview. The time of time was taken on the table and said, "It's × point × point now, we have × minute to do ..., finally stay × minute to summarize, that is, to × point × point, then we start doing now ... …Bar". Generally speaking, no one will rob you. Of course, you still have to do his duties.
2. Striving for the right to speak in front of strong people This is the troubles of many students. This discussion is always talking, and it is not inserted in one sentence. Mainly rely on the opportunity to grasp the timing. Generally speaking, strong people speaking are more logical and organized. Therefore, there are two opportunities for interpolation. One is that when he explained his point of view, when he said a certain time, we could intervene and say, "I think ×× is very reasonable, but because time is limited, we still listen to the next classmate "Let's", or "... (the same), let's discuss the next question first, I think ..."; Second, when the other party explains multiple points, "first" and "second" It is the time to intervene when he finishes the third one, and the content can be the same as before.
3. Mutual understanding before the interview, exchange contact information , although it is said not to divide in advance, it is good to understand in advance. First, when discussing, you can join the other party's name when you agree or deny the opinions of others, instead of just saying "this classmate" and "the classmate". The second is to pull people on the same road. After the interview, someone walks together and has more opportunities to communicate. Third, you can communicate the news and know if you have been by BS without being tortured by long waiting.
4. Inciting opposition Generally speaking, the risk of new and different risks is still relatively large, but if you are sure, you can still propose opposition. This technique is mainly in the way of speaking. "I think everyone's point of view is great, but if you think about it from the ×× perspective, I think it can ..., I don’t know what you think?" There is a hidden here. Tips are to learn to praise others. Whenever they, this trick is very useful, including in the debate.
5. Pay attention to the limited conditions of the material It when looking at the material, it is easy to analyze some big points directly, thereby ignoring the limited condition. If there is a problem with the communication of a company, whether it is between individual colleagues, between the boss and the subordinates, or between the departments, these are important for us to consider issues. What we have to do is to remind everyone when everyone ignores this, but don't force everyone to accept it. As long as you say, the interviewer will notice it.
6. The logic and stripeness of the speech The logic is mainly to figure out the causal relationship of each point. It is best to talk about the process of thinking about yourself. The rationality is to learn to use the transition words such as "first", "first", and "last". This technique is usually intended to develop habits, and you will be handy during the interview. Of course, it should be noted that before the point description, you must know how many points you want to say. Don't just "first". After speaking, there is nothing.
The intermediate version: 1. Try not to be the person who finally states to the interviewer, but the person who previously made a summary in the group. This is because the person in the final statement will still be more nervous. Even if the content summarized before is sufficient, it is still difficult to perform perfect performance. But how do you express your summary ability to the interviewer? That's it at this time. When it is almost time, everyone's opinions are almost published, and it can be said that "everyone's point of view is very good. I see that time is about to be coming. What are the supplements. First of all ... ". This is obvious for your own benefits, because even if the final summary summarizes well, you have your credit. However, what is a bit harmful is that if the final summary is not strong enough, it is easy to be affected by your thoughts, which will be abnormal.
2. Pay attention to and take care of members who do not have or speak less This skills do not always have the opportunity to use. Only when there are tightness, you can use it when you lack experienced members. When the views are expressed in turn or even free discussions, we must always pay attention to the more silent members. When we want to start changing the topic, we can say "Let's listen to the opinions of XX classmates first." Didn't you say that you should not grab the leader, this action will make the interviewer feel that you have the quality of the leader because you take care of all members.
3. In free debate, there is no need to do lasting disputes with the same person When someone refutes or questioned ourselves, it is easy for us to argue with each other. I have been standing with you all the time, I quarrel one by one, this is obviously not good. In fact, we don't need to respond to him, and other debaters in the same team will respond. This advantage is that to avoid turning freedom debates into individual tit -for -tat, it also shows his calmness of cooperation with the team. Of course, if the teammates have no one to respond, they still have to rely on themselves.
4. Being a coordinator When the group members have the opinions, if the number of people is relatively average, it is generally time -saving. But if we fall, we can focus on the opinions of most people, supplement alternative opinions appropriately, and praise the comments of the students "creative". This is also the effect that the interviewer feels that you are a leader.
Senior version: The research and development Ing ... Discussion ...
7. End words , finally got it ... R n general companies will use group faces as one side. The main investigation is comprehensive quality. The main points and standards of different companies will not be much different. Therefore "Good yourself". In fact, the quality of the group discussion is worthy of cultivation for everyone, especially logical thinking. Therefore, we can appropriately rely on ourselves in this direction, if we really want to go through a certain group.
The above remarks are personal views, for reference only, because the most important thing is that no professionals have never come out to tell me whether the above things are correct and useful, which may still have a reaction. Therefore, you should think about it by yourself, especially the last technique. Use cautiously ...
The finding a worker is a long process, and it is also a growth process. In a semester of finding work experience, I feel that I have learned more than the previous three years. Of course, it does not mean professional knowledge. Still the one, now everything is said to be character, I hope this thing can help those in need, and save some character for themselves. Finally, I wish everyone can find their favorite jobs, welcome everyone to criticize advice!
Super detailed group guidelines
. Foreword
group P may be a nightmare for many students, because they are unfamiliar to the form of interviews, they are not talking about tension. There is even no concept of the topic of the discussion. The younger brother once had such doubts, but when he came in a semester, he successfully passed the group noodles of Bei Electric, Ernstone, Ericsson, Mei'an Jianye, Vanke, Nestlé, GE Medical and other companies. I still have accumulated some experience, and I feel that the skills of the group are relatively more skillful. Personally, I feel that there are too many uncertain factors in one side. Many times, they must be determined by the interviewers' preferences and moods, and the criteria for judging groups are relatively more and relatively quantitative, so there will be more strategies. Now I will write my own experience, hoping to help brothers and sisters who are still troubled in the group and later.
. The classification of group surface
1. The general group P
as long as the interviewer or the interviewer is more than 1 From the perspective of the interviewer, there are generally 1 pair, more to 1 and more:
1 pair multiple:
The essence of this interview is still single -sided. I will not give ugliness here. The main thing to pay attention to is to take care of the feelings of the interviewers. Try to communicate with all the interviewers when I introduce themselves and answer questions. The official said that at the next paragraph, look at another interviewer to express naturally as much as possible. Of course, when thinking, I always looked at a certain interviewer.
Mest pairs 1:
This is the most insignificant and most inspector interview method, which generates the root cause is the HR laziness of recruiting companies! Intersection In order to save time, the interviewer hopes to pick out the outstanding performance from the crowd in a short time. The general process is to introduce themselves in turn, and then the interviewer asked questions. Different from the number of interviewers and interviews, the interviewer's questions are different. There are more people and less people. Generally, interviewers ask interviewers who are interested in. On the contrary, if there is no time for people, the same question is raised to allow the interviewer to answer in turn. For the former, the key is self -introduction. In addition to carefully preparing your own self -introduction and learning to avoid strengths and avoid weaknesses, more importantly, prepare a version of different lengths, such as 5 seconds (can be used to answer "one word or one sentence to introduce yourself", "Your biggest feature is your biggest feature is What "," How do people around you evaluate you "and other issues such as one -sided), 30 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes. The purpose is to highlight yourself as much as possible within the specified time (of course, the advantages), and let the interviewer remember himself. After the self -introduction, the back is basically the same. For the latter, the self -introduction mentioned earlier is also applicable, because this is the best time to express itself, but more importantly, the next question answer. For this part, although the nature is similar to one -sided, it is more difficult, and the interviewer should be compared. This requires us to make full preparations before the interview, including resume and openness. For resumes, it is best to use the STAR rule to answer, and strive to make your example plump. Every work and decision you make is strictly thinking. Regarding open issues, we must not only think about their actual situation, but also think about how most people answer and what unique insights can they have. After preparing, it is the time to answer during the interview. Generally speaking, the interviewer does not limit the order of the interviewer, but is tended to be voluntary. You can choose to answer the questions that you have a confidence or have unique insights. As for the question that can only be said and has no distinctive answers, we must take the initiative to answer, seize the opportunity, and say everything I can think of. In the end, it is a good choice to listen to other people's views. Finally, making a consent summary of consent is a compromise. Of course, these are not absolute. Even if you are sure of all the problems, you can also converge appropriately and let others answer first, instead of being too strong.
Mreasing:
This interviews are the comprehensive version of the above two, but the number of people will not be too much. It should be noted that the above is the above.
2. The narrow group P
is mainly similar to one -sided one side. Now the discussion is the real group. Role play, debate and other methods have their own characteristics. The group as mentioned below is a narrow group. The discussion of the non -leadership group is mainly discussed. The different points of other ways of the group will be mentioned separately.
. The form of group surface
Whether it is a group of faces, the layout of its originality is similar, more pairs, and one interviewer does the opening white, including the interview process and requirements Wait. After the interview, the interviewer no longer speaks, nor will he participate in the discussion. The entire process is over to the end of the interviewer. The interviewer will be distributed in different corners of the interview venue to observe the performance of each interviewer and record. Of course, there is a limited time for the interview process, and the interviewer will announce the time when it is over.
It companies will let the interviewer use white paper to make a card before the interview starts, and write their own names to facilitate the recognition of the interviewer.
For the interviewer, everyone will sit together and not side by side because it must be convenient to discuss. And the company usually prepares related information and paper. After the interview officially started, the interviewer spent a short period of time reading and thinking alone. In the end, the task that the group needed to complete was considered their opinions and made appropriate records. Then the interviewers took turns to express their own ideas. Next is a free discussion. Finally, according to the specific requirements, the summary statement is made. Generally, before making the final statement to the interviewer, the content of the group should be summarized and reached a consensus or supplemented (this step is not necessarily there. Nortel's role -playing is just the role -playing of Nortel's role. ).
In the interview, the company needs to recover all the information, including draft paper, so it is generally prohibited from taking notes and signs on the information. This should be noted. For draft paper, it is difficult to say if it affects the results of the interview, but there is no harm to develop a good note habit, haha.
. Guidance thought
has said so much, and has not said anything skillful. Why is this? In fact, I personally think that the skills are always used for extra points, and the essence and content of discussion are the key, so we should pay attention to and think about the discussion issues.
Generally speaking, the problems of group noodles are non -professional. It mainly examines the interviewer's analytical ability, logical thinking ability, innovation ability, solve problems and on -the -spot response (other expression skills, teamwork spirit, etc. Not discuss this part). The so -called guidance thought, in fact, there is nothing else. The philosophy we have been learning from college in high school is enough. Dialectics, two points, grasping the main contradictions, the overall view, the world is constantly changing development, etc. These are the truths that everyone has learned and easy to understand, but in ordinary life and even interviews, it is difficult for us to use these these To help us analyze the problem.
In my experience, not all the truths will be completely used. Just catch two: the overall situation, vertical and horizontal analysis
1. The overall situation
At the time of speaking, I caught the problem that I was finally solved and simply talked about my own solution.我的做法是，先对材料做一个整体的分析，把几个问题理清：材料基于一个怎样的环境与前提，材料中最大的问题（不一定是需要我们讨论解决的问题，但有可能是What are the root causes of all issues, what are the causes and logical relationships of the problem, and what kind of standards should we set to look at the problem. With logical analysis and standards, I will put forward my own views based on my own analysis and standards. The advantage of this is that you can have a global understanding of the problem without picking up sesame seeds and throwing watermelon. At the same time, you can also express your ability to the interviewer.
2. Vertical and horizontal analysis
The basic analysis of the material must be seen in the argument or point of view. During the interview, everyone's point of view is inevitable, but there are still ways to make their views full as much as possible.
Stime analysis:
This is the easiest. Try to support your views as much as possible. It can be from the same type, or from different types. Of course, the level of younger brothers is limited. Not only the examples of the centers do not necessarily match what I want to say, but even the views I mentioned are more mentally ill, so for reference only, the big cows laughed.
Nestlé topic:
The debate: the more choices, the more happiness is the more?
our point of view: The more you choose, the more happiness the happiness
In starting from life, four directions of clothing, food, housing and transportation, find arguments, school uniforms, rice dining dishes, housing units, travel transportation tools, etc. What a better. Diver into the usual entertainment method, such as music before bedtime, diversity of TV shows, etc. Combined with the current job finding work, the more choices from recruitment companies and candidates ...
are very useful in the debate competition. Everyone has something to say, having the opportunity to express themselves, and the performance of the entire team will give people one person. At that time, the discussion point mentioned by our opponent did not have obvious logical relationships, so the content of each person's speaking was almost the same, and the repetitiveness was great. Another advantage is that when we debate freely, we can easily dominate the topic, because the scope is wide, we can find examples, and we can launch an attack from multiple points.
Themored analysis:
This is mainly a matter of consciousness, and it is easy to be ignored. Many times when expressing their views, using this consciousness to supplement the description will give people a sense of strict thinking. Specifically, your own point of view is only suitable for local time, because everything is constantly developing and changing.
Vientiane questions:
The group discussion: Definition of success? Is it successful in scolding? Background information: Zhang Ziyi, Hu Ge
Horizontal analysis: The definition of success can be divided into two aspects to discuss (standard), personal value and social value.
Success to different people has different meanings. Even ordinary people, as long as he is satisfied with his work, family and life, then he has succeeded
Lallplace analysis: Simply with his lifetime in his life. Combining, instant glory is not equal to eternal. Even if the characters mentioned in the materials are successful, it is temporary, and it cannot directly judge that the success of this person is a lifetime.
For case analysis, Case Study is generally used in training rather than recruitment. The case analysis in the interview is actually not much different from the discussion of the non -leadership group, mainly focusing on the focus. Case analysis will pay more attention to the process and reason of the conclusion.
. The division of characters
Finally talked about a little technical problem. First of all, many people have heard that there are different roles in the group, including time, including time, including time, including time, including time, including time, including time Control Time, Leader, recorder, summons, etc. Some students like to do this division of labor before the interview and designate the role of each person. I am more opposed to this approach. First of all, these characters never need to tell the interviewer, and the interviewer will have his own judgment. Secondly, except for Time, the determination of other characters is not conducive to the final performance of the group. The first is the leader. There is no need to say this thing at all, otherwise it may cause the argument. The concept of time, but pays more attention to details and pay attention to all the requirements of the discussion. So what does it say that there is no clear leader? Then there is a recorder. In fact, this is the worst. The ideal method is that everyone must take notes, not only their own opinions, but also the views of others. Because if your speech is only from your own perspective, it will be very one -sided. And only when you listen to and record the opinions of others, will you have the opportunity to analyze the views of others, so as to refute or improve your views. Finally, the summary. Generally speaking, the conclusion needs a clearer thinking, which is what I said before the overall situation and logical thinking. Do it, and the same, it is difficult to know which one is most suitable for this summary before the discussion.
S summary of the responsibilities of various roles:
time: Pay attention to arrange the entire discussion process. How long does it take for each link, almost time to remind all members.
Leader: This responsibility is relatively vague (originally discussion of no leadership group). Generally, it is the process of hosting the entire discussion, reminding members not to leave the problem, pay attention to the length of the speech, etc. Of course, there are other qualities, which will be mentioned later.
recorder: clearly record the views and speeches of everyone, and organize it to the summary. This requires a clear note ability to minimize the difficulty of reading. Generally, the words should not be too ugly. Each person's point of view is clear. List according to some points, and make appropriate attention.
The summary: The result of the discussion of the group stated to the interviewer. The main thing is to pay attention to the logic and rules of speaking. It is best to explain the process of thinking about the group members. Of course, if the amount of some statements is relatively large, the points can be expanded to other members.
This to play this way, I played it once. The biggest feeling is to fully integrate into the role, and after watching the materials, communicate with members of other characters as soon as possible. Because usually, the material held by a character does not have the content of other characters, so only through full communication can we understand the situation of the entire discussion and the problem to be actually solved.
6. Tips and precautions
The following are some tips summarized by the younger brother. You can still use it appropriately to add points on the group. Of course Again.
The primary version:
1. Grab Time
This to hold the watch or mobile phone in your hand before the interview. The time of time was taken on the table and said, "It's × point × point now, we have × minute to do ..., finally stay × minute to summarize, that is, to × point × point, then we start doing now ... …Bar". Generally speaking, no one will rob you. Of course, you still have to do his duties.
2. Striving for the right to speak in front of strong people
This is the troubles of many students. This discussion is always talking, and it is not inserted in one sentence. Mainly rely on the opportunity to grasp the timing. Generally speaking, strong people speaking are more logical and organized. Therefore, there are two opportunities for interpolation. One is that when he explained his point of view, when he said a certain time, we could intervene and say, "I think ×× is very reasonable, but because time is limited, we still listen to the next classmate "Let's", or "... (the same), let's discuss the next question first, I think ..."; Second, when the other party explains multiple points, "first" and "second" It is the time to intervene when he finishes the third one, and the content can be the same as before.
3. Mutual understanding before the interview, exchange contact information
, although it is said not to divide in advance, it is good to understand in advance. First, when discussing, you can join the other party's name when you agree or deny the opinions of others, instead of just saying "this classmate" and "the classmate". The second is to pull people on the same road. After the interview, someone walks together and has more opportunities to communicate. Third, you can communicate the news and know if you have been by BS without being tortured by long waiting.
4. Inciting opposition
Generally speaking, the risk of new and different risks is still relatively large, but if you are sure, you can still propose opposition. This technique is mainly in the way of speaking. "I think everyone's point of view is great, but if you think about it from the ×× perspective, I think it can ..., I don’t know what you think?" There is a hidden here. Tips are to learn to praise others. Whenever they, this trick is very useful, including in the debate.
5. Pay attention to the limited conditions of the material
It when looking at the material, it is easy to analyze some big points directly, thereby ignoring the limited condition. If there is a problem with the communication of a company, whether it is between individual colleagues, between the boss and the subordinates, or between the departments, these are important for us to consider issues. What we have to do is to remind everyone when everyone ignores this, but don't force everyone to accept it. As long as you say, the interviewer will notice it.
6. The logic and stripeness of the speech
The logic is mainly to figure out the causal relationship of each point. It is best to talk about the process of thinking about yourself. The rationality is to learn to use the transition words such as "first", "first", and "last". This technique is usually intended to develop habits, and you will be handy during the interview. Of course, it should be noted that before the point description, you must know how many points you want to say. Don't just "first". After speaking, there is nothing.
The intermediate version:
1. Try not to be the person who finally states to the interviewer, but the person who previously made a summary in the group.
This is because the person in the final statement will still be more nervous. Even if the content summarized before is sufficient, it is still difficult to perform perfect performance. But how do you express your summary ability to the interviewer? That's it at this time. When it is almost time, everyone's opinions are almost published, and it can be said that "everyone's point of view is very good. I see that time is about to be coming. What are the supplements. First of all ... ". This is obvious for your own benefits, because even if the final summary summarizes well, you have your credit. However, what is a bit harmful is that if the final summary is not strong enough, it is easy to be affected by your thoughts, which will be abnormal.
2. Pay attention to and take care of members who do not have or speak less
This skills do not always have the opportunity to use. Only when there are tightness, you can use it when you lack experienced members. When the views are expressed in turn or even free discussions, we must always pay attention to the more silent members. When we want to start changing the topic, we can say "Let's listen to the opinions of XX classmates first." Didn't you say that you should not grab the leader, this action will make the interviewer feel that you have the quality of the leader because you take care of all members.
3. In free debate, there is no need to do lasting disputes with the same person
When someone refutes or questioned ourselves, it is easy for us to argue with each other. I have been standing with you all the time, I quarrel one by one, this is obviously not good. In fact, we don't need to respond to him, and other debaters in the same team will respond. This advantage is that to avoid turning freedom debates into individual tit -for -tat, it also shows his calmness of cooperation with the team. Of course, if the teammates have no one to respond, they still have to rely on themselves.
4. Being a coordinator
When the group members have the opinions, if the number of people is relatively average, it is generally time -saving. But if we fall, we can focus on the opinions of most people, supplement alternative opinions appropriately, and praise the comments of the students "creative". This is also the effect that the interviewer feels that you are a leader.
Senior version:
The research and development Ing ... Discussion ...
7. End words
, finally got it ... R n general companies will use group faces as one side. The main investigation is comprehensive quality. The main points and standards of different companies will not be much different. Therefore "Good yourself". In fact, the quality of the group discussion is worthy of cultivation for everyone, especially logical thinking. Therefore, we can appropriately rely on ourselves in this direction, if we really want to go through a certain group.
The above remarks are personal views, for reference only, because the most important thing is that no professionals have never come out to tell me whether the above things are correct and useful, which may still have a reaction. Therefore, you should think about it by yourself, especially the last technique. Use cautiously ...
The finding a worker is a long process, and it is also a growth process. In a semester of finding work experience, I feel that I have learned more than the previous three years. Of course, it does not mean professional knowledge. Still the one, now everything is said to be character, I hope this thing can help those in need, and save some character for themselves.
Finally, I wish everyone can find their favorite jobs, welcome everyone to criticize advice!
;